Dear [*FIRST-NAME*], 

If you look at the table of assigned reviews, we would like to highlight that you cannot trust the values in column "senior PC member". 

(Easychair selects a value at random from the SPC members reviewing the paper.) 

Ideally, the metareview for each paper lists the 1AC in the confidential comments field, but not all SPC followed the proposed procedure... 

Our apologies for the inconveniences of using a new conference management system; support for multiple reviewing roles needs some improvements for 2018, but we have to workaround these for 2017. 

Best regards, 

Arjen, Hang and Ryen 

PS: If you lost track of the papers where you are 1AC, feel free to request help by emailing us.